“In David P. v. United Healthcare Ins. Co., a Tenth Circuit panel endorsed a remedy that may seem unusual to laypersons and practitioners alike: having concluded that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan administrator abused its discretion in the handling of a healthcare plan beneficiary’s claim, the appellate court found that, without a clear showing that the claim should have been in fact granted, the matter should be sent back to the defendant plan administrator to correct its own mistake.”
Read More